Nutrition & Diets

Top 10 Vegetables You Should Buy Organic First

Top 10 Vegetables You Should Buy Organic First
ByHealthy Flux Editorial Team
Published 1/2/2026 • Updated 1/2/2026

Summary

Choosing organic is not just a trendy upgrade, it can be a practical way to lower day to day pesticide exposure, especially for certain vegetables. This article follows the video’s core message: pesticide use is rising, residues can include multiple chemicals on one crop, and safety testing often misses real life “mixtures” and long term buildup. You will learn the 10 vegetables the video prioritizes for organic, why washing helps but has limits, how the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 lists work, and simple shopping steps that can reduce exposure substantially.

📹 Watch the full video above or read the comprehensive summary below

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • The video’s main priority list for organic vegetables starts with spinach and other leafy greens, because they often carry higher and multiple pesticide residues.
  • A key concern raised is “chemical stacking,” real life exposure involves mixtures over decades, while much testing focuses on single chemicals and short term effects.
  • Washing produce can help, but the video emphasizes that many pesticides are fat soluble or can penetrate into the plant, so rinsing is not a complete fix.
  • Use the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 as a practical shopping tool, especially when budget forces tradeoffs, and remember lists can vary by region and year.
  • Beyond shopping, the video’s lifestyle angle is that whole, unprocessed foods, sleep, exercise, stress reduction, and sometimes sauna can support the body’s natural detox capacity.

Why this “organic list” is really about your total toxic load

You are standing in the produce aisle, holding two bags of spinach. One says organic. One is cheaper. You are not trying to be “perfect,” you are trying to be practical.

The video frames this choice as bigger than a single purchase. The argument is that pesticide exposure is not just about what is on one leaf today, it is about the long, steady drip of chemicals across years, plus the way modern farming can weaken soil and plants, which can drive even more chemical use.

A single point lands hard: we are using more pesticides than ever. The speaker cites about 3.7 billion kilos per year, which he translates to a little over one pound per person. Even if that number feels abstract, the perspective is simple, these are poisons by design, and small amounts can matter for some people, especially with repeated exposure.

This is also where the video becomes less about “food fear” and more about systems. The framing is that aggressive farming pulls dozens of minerals out of soil, then replaces only a few with synthetic inputs. Over time, soil becomes depleted, microbial diversity drops, plants become weaker, pests become harder to manage, and chemical use rises. A vicious cycle.

Did you know? The USDA’s Pesticide Data Program (PDP) regularly tests foods for pesticide residues, and its reports are one of the main data sources used to build consumer friendly lists like the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15. You can explore the program here: USDA Pesticide Data Program.

The video’s Top 10 vegetables to buy organic (ranked)

This is the heart of the video: a prioritized list, not a vague “try to buy organic when you can.” It is meant to help you spend your money where it may matter most.

Below is the exact ranked set of vegetables the video calls out as the “dirtiest” in terms of pesticide residues and use.

1 to 5, the “do your best to always buy organic” group

Spinach. The video puts spinach at number one because testing often finds high levels of pesticide residues, sometimes multiple different chemicals on the same plant.
Kale, collard greens, and mustard greens. Another leafy green cluster that frequently shows high residues, with the added concern that some pesticides seen in the US have been banned elsewhere.
Bell peppers and hot peppers. These are highlighted for often carrying high residue levels.
Green beans. The video notes that you may find multiple different residues here as well.
Tomatoes. Thin skin is the key detail, it can allow easier penetration, and most people eat the skin.

A small but important nuance appears here. The list is ranked, and the speaker emphasizes that there is a big difference between number one and number ten. In his approach, the top half is where you get the biggest return on your organic dollars.

6 to 10, still high priority, but more flexible

Squash. Even with thicker skin on some varieties, the view is that fat soluble pesticides can still leach into the flesh.
Celery. It is described as having an irregular surface and being porous, which increases surface area and absorption.
Lettuce. Large surface area again, many layers and folds.
Cucumbers. The video adds a specific issue, cucumbers are often coated in wax to prevent water loss, and that wax can trap residues.
Broccoli. Dense florets and tight folds can “trap” pesticides, making them hard to remove.

Pro Tip: If you can only upgrade a few items to organic, start with the top five in the video’s list. That is the “highest impact” strategy this approach keeps returning to.

Why pesticides can be a bigger deal than “a little residue”

It is easy to hear “pesticide residue” and picture a tiny amount that surely cannot matter.

The video’s unique perspective is that the real problem is cumulative and combinational, not just a single chemical at a single dose.

The “chemical stacking” argument, explained simply

The speaker walks through a thought experiment using LD1 and LD50 (lethal dose concepts used in toxicology). The idea is that regulators often test chemicals one at a time, then define a dose that causes harm in a small percentage of test animals, and then apply a safety factor.

The critique is not that all testing is useless. It is that this method does not reflect real life.

In real life, you are not exposed to one chemical for one day. You might be exposed to many chemicals, in small amounts, across decades. The video argues that if one compound is enough to kill 1 percent of test animals acutely, the remaining 99 percent are not “fine,” they are stressed. Add a second compound, then a third, and the combined effect may not be additive (1 percent plus 1 percent). It could be far larger.

This concern overlaps with what many scientists call mixture effects or cumulative risk. Some agencies acknowledge this challenge. For example, the US Environmental Protection Agency discusses approaches to assessing pesticide risks, including cumulative considerations for chemicals with similar mechanisms. You can read more about EPA pesticide risk assessment here: EPA, Pesticide Risk Assessment.

Acute exposure vs chronic exposure

Another key distinction in the video is acute versus chronic exposure.

Short tests can detect immediate toxicity. But they cannot easily model what happens when small exposures accumulate over years. The video’s point is that long term, low dose exposure is hard to study perfectly, and controlling all variables for decades is close to impossible.

That is not a reason to panic. It is a reason to reduce avoidable exposure where it is easiest to do so.

Fat soluble chemicals and the “storage problem”

The speaker also emphasizes that many pesticides and pollutants are fat soluble, meaning they dissolve in fat rather than water. In this framing, fat soluble substances can accumulate in fatty tissues, including the brain and body fat, where turnover is slower.

The body does have detox systems, especially the liver, that can process many compounds. But the video’s argument is capacity based, if exposure exceeds what the body can process, more may be stored or “sequestered.”

Important: If you are pregnant, trying to conceive, or have a condition that affects liver function, it is worth discussing chemical exposures and dietary choices with a clinician you trust. This is not about extreme detox plans, it is about safer, steadier decisions.

Washing helps, but it is not the whole story

Rinsing your produce is still worth doing.

But the video is blunt about the limits. If a pesticide is fat soluble, it may not wash off easily with water alone. And if a substance has penetrated into the plant tissue, no amount of surface washing removes what is inside.

This is why the speaker treats “just wash it well” as incomplete advice, especially for the highest risk vegetables on the list.

That said, washing can reduce dirt, microbes, and some residues. The US Food and Drug Administration offers practical produce handling steps, including rinsing under running water and scrubbing firm produce. See: FDA, Tips for Fresh Produce Safety.

Here is a grounded way to combine both ideas, wash everything, and prioritize organic for the items most likely to carry residues.

Dirty Dozen, Clean 15, and the shopping shortcuts the video likes

The video leans heavily on a consumer strategy: use residue testing data to guide tradeoffs.

In the US, the USDA and FDA collect and publish pesticide residue testing data. Then an advocacy organization, the Environmental Working Group (EWG), analyzes that data and publishes the Dirty Dozen (highest residue) and Clean 15 (lowest residue) lists.

This approach is very practical. It is also dynamic. The speaker notes that lists can change by year and vary by region, but there is often overlap because certain crops are naturally more vulnerable.

»MORE: The video recommends checking EWG’s annual lists and supporting their work if you find it useful. You can find the latest lists here: EWG Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen.

The PLU code trick, and what it can and cannot do

The video also mentions PLU codes (price lookup codes) on produce stickers as a quick identifier:

A 5 digit code starting with 9 typically indicates organic.
A 4 digit code typically indicates conventionally grown.
A 5 digit code starting with 8 has been used to indicate GMO, but in practice it is uncommon and not consistently used.

This is a helpful shortcut, but it is not a perfect verification system. PLU codes are primarily for inventory and checkout, and not all produce has stickers.

Expert Q&A

Q: If I cannot afford organic, is conventional produce still worth eating?

A: Yes, for most people, eating more vegetables is still strongly associated with better health outcomes overall. The video’s approach is not “avoid produce,” it is “prioritize organic for the highest residue items,” then use tools like the Clean 15 to make budget friendly choices.

If cost is tight, focus on swapping the top five vegetables on the video’s list to organic first, keep washing everything, and aim for mostly whole foods. If you have special circumstances like pregnancy or immune suppression, consider getting personalized advice.

Health educator perspective, based on the video’s framework

A language point that shapes how you shop

The speaker has two “pet peeves” that are more than semantics.

First is the word conventional. The argument is that “conventional” sounds normal and safe, when it often means grown with chemical pesticides. Second is the grocery store labeling of a small corner as “natural foods,” which quietly implies the rest of the store is not natural.

This is the video’s storytelling punch: notice the labels, then decide what you want to vote for with your wallet.

The cleanest produce list (and why some plants resist pests)

After spending most of the time on the “dirtiest” vegetables, the video pivots to relief: some produce tends to carry fewer residues.

This is not presented as a reason to avoid organic. It is presented as a triage tool for real life.

Here are the “cleaner” items the video lists, in the order given:

Avocado. Described as the cleanest, largely because of its thick protective skin.
Sweet corn. Low residue in testing, but the video warns it may be GMO unless you buy organic.
Onion. Natural pest resistance is highlighted, including sulfur compounds.
Sweet peas. Often lower residues.
Asparagus. Another example of natural pest resistance.
Cabbage.
Mushrooms.
Sweet potato.
Carrots.
Cauliflower.

The underlying logic is intuitive: some plants have built in defenses (like sulfur compounds), and others have physical barriers (thick skins or peels). This is also consistent with why peeling can reduce residues for some foods, though it may also remove fiber and nutrients.

What the research shows: Residue testing programs like the USDA Pesticide Data ProgramTrusted Source repeatedly find that residue levels vary widely by crop, which is why crop specific lists can be useful for targeted changes.

A practical plan to cut exposure by 80 to 90% without perfection

The video’s closing message is motivating: you cannot eliminate all exposures in a polluted world, but you can make smart choices and dramatically reduce what you take in.

This section turns the video’s ideas into simple steps.

How to shop using the video’s “two list” method

Always prioritize organic for the top five vegetables on the dirty list. Start with spinach, then the leafy greens group, then peppers, green beans, and tomatoes. This is the clearest “bang for your buck” rule in the video.

If you cannot buy organic, choose produce that tends to be cleaner. Use the Clean 15 concept as your backup plan, especially for items like avocado and onion.

Wash and handle produce like it matters, because it does. Rinse under running water, scrub firm produce, and keep cutting boards clean. The FDA’s produce safety guidanceTrusted Source is a good baseline.

Be extra cautious with waxed or high surface area produce. The video specifically flags cucumbers with wax, celery’s porous surface, and leafy greens with lots of folds.

Make your “vote with your wallet” consistent, not perfect. The speaker’s point is that repeated purchasing patterns influence what stores stock and what farmers grow.

A key nuance from the video: sometimes freshness wins. The speaker mentions occasionally choosing non organic broccoli if the organic option looks less fresh, because overall diet quality still matters.

The lifestyle piece, “detox” as daily capacity, not a cleanse

The video repeatedly returns to one idea: your body is always processing exposures, and lifestyle changes can support that capacity.

This is not presented as a magic shield against pesticides. It is presented as a way to avoid overwhelming your natural systems.

The speaker’s main lifestyle points:

Eat mostly real, whole foods. The suggestion is 80 to 100% of intake from whole, unprocessed foods, because they contain nutrients the body uses for normal metabolic and detox pathways.
Keep processed foods low, ideally near zero, and no more than 20%. The argument is that processed foods are “depleted,” and may add more additives and exposures while providing fewer supportive nutrients.
Prioritize sleep and exercise. The video frames these as foundational rhythms that help the body repair and regulate.
Consider sauna as a supportive tool. Sweating is discussed as one way that may help certain elimination pathways, though responses vary and sauna is not appropriate for everyone.
Manage stress, consider meditation. The argument is that stress can interfere with healing and detox processes.

Pro Tip: If “80 to 100% whole food” feels overwhelming, start with one daily anchor meal you can keep mostly unprocessed, for example a big salad with organic spinach, or a veggie scramble with organic peppers and tomatoes.

Expert Q&A

Q: Does buying organic guarantee pesticide free food?

A: No. Organic standards restrict many synthetic pesticides, but organic farms can still use certain approved pest controls, and trace residues can occur through drift or environmental contamination. The video’s point is not perfection, it is meaningful reduction, especially for crops that tend to show higher residues.

For the most accurate expectations, think of organic as “lower risk for certain pesticide exposures,” not “zero exposure.”

Nutrition focused health educator framing

Key Takeaways

The video’s organic priority list is led by spinach and other leafy greens, then peppers, green beans, and tomatoes, because these crops often show higher or multiple residues.
A central concern is chemical stacking, real life exposure involves mixtures and long timelines, while much testing evaluates single chemicals and short term outcomes.
Washing produce is helpful but limited, especially for fat soluble pesticides and residues that can penetrate into plant tissue.
Use Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 style lists as a practical budget tool, and remember regional and year to year variation.
Lifestyle basics matter in this framework, mostly whole foods, low processed foods, sleep, exercise, stress reduction, and sometimes sauna are positioned as ways to support the body’s natural capacity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which vegetables did the video say you should always try to buy organic?
The video emphasizes the top half of its list as highest priority: spinach, kale and related leafy greens (collards and mustard greens), bell and hot peppers, green beans, and tomatoes. If you can only switch a few items to organic, it suggests starting there.
Is washing vegetables enough to remove pesticides?
Washing can remove dirt and may reduce some surface residues, but the video stresses it is not a complete solution. Some pesticides are fat soluble or can move into plant tissue, and those are harder to remove with water alone.
What are the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 lists?
They are annual consumer lists that summarize which fruits and vegetables tend to have the highest and lowest pesticide residues. They are commonly based on US residue testing data from agencies like the USDA and FDA, analyzed by groups such as EWG.
What does a PLU code starting with 9 mean on produce?
The video notes that a five digit PLU code starting with 9 usually indicates organic produce, while a four digit code is typically conventional. Not all produce has stickers, and PLU codes are not a perfect verification method.
Are the video’s lists the same in every country?
The video says the ranking was based on US data and that there can be regional variation and year to year changes. Still, it argues there is often overlap because some crops are naturally more vulnerable to pests and therefore more heavily treated.

Get Evidence-Based Health Tips

Join readers getting weekly insights on health, nutrition, and wellness. No spam, ever.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

More in Nutrition & Diets

View all
RFK Jr’s “Banned Foods” List, What It Means for Your Plate

RFK Jr’s “Banned Foods” List, What It Means for Your Plate

Most people think “banned foods” means a simple list of bad items to avoid. The presenter’s point is different and more practical, he frames it as a policy and incentives problem that shapes what ends up in schools, SNAP purchases, and everyday grocery carts. In his view, modern food is often “not food anymore,” because it is packed with artificial colors, industrial sweeteners, seed oils, and preservatives that keep products shelf-stable. He argues tax-funded programs should promote health, not disease, and questions why government money would subsidize soda, candy, and ultra-processed foods. He also highlights a less discussed issue, the GRAS loophole, where companies can self-certify new chemicals as safe without notifying the FDA. The article below translates his 10-item focus into realistic shopping, cooking, and label-reading steps, while noting trade-offs and who should be careful with higher-risk choices like raw milk.

Doctor-Favorite OTC Picks That Actually Make Sense

Doctor-Favorite OTC Picks That Actually Make Sense

Over-the-counter aisles can feel like a wall of hype, so this video takes a refreshingly practical approach: ask medical specialists what they personally “swear by.” The picks are not flashy, they are functional. Think nasal saline for congestion, preservative-free thicker eye drops for dry eye, psyllium husk fiber for smoother bowel movements, lubricant for comfort during sex, Vicks VapoRub as a budget toenail option, a home blood pressure cuff for self-tracking, tea as a long-standing wellness habit, fluticasone spray used creatively for adhesive itch, and topical diclofenac for joint pain. The throughline is simple: choose tools with clear, realistic benefits.

The Surprising Truth About Raw Milk: A Deep Dive

The Surprising Truth About Raw Milk: A Deep Dive

Raw milk has surged in popularity, often framed as a more “natural,” easier-to-digest option with extra enzymes and probiotics. This video’s unique perspective is not anti milk, it is pro evidence. It traces how unsafe milk in the 1800s helped drive pasteurization, a change linked to dramatic drops in infant deaths. It also explores the intriguing “farm effect” research suggesting early life farm exposures, possibly including raw milk, may reduce allergies and asthma. But the discussion emphasizes a key trade-off: raw milk carries a much higher risk of serious foodborne illness, while most nutrition claims are unproven for adults.

RFK Jr. at HHS: A Food-First Bet on Health Change

RFK Jr. at HHS: A Food-First Bet on Health Change

This video frames RFK Jr. becoming HHS Secretary as a rare chance to tackle America’s chronic disease crisis by changing the food system, not just expanding medical care. The speaker focuses on subsidies that make ultra-processed foods cheap, the reality that SNAP can buy items like soda and pastries, and the idea that low-income health gaps are tied to food access. The discussion also critiques media incentives, questions agency priorities, and argues that better nutrition messaging and research funding choices could shift outcomes, especially for kids.

We use cookies to provide the best experience and analyze site usage. By continuing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.