Top 10 Vegetables You Should Buy Organic First
Summary
Choosing organic is not just a trendy upgrade, it can be a practical way to lower day to day pesticide exposure, especially for certain vegetables. This article follows the video’s core message: pesticide use is rising, residues can include multiple chemicals on one crop, and safety testing often misses real life “mixtures” and long term buildup. You will learn the 10 vegetables the video prioritizes for organic, why washing helps but has limits, how the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 lists work, and simple shopping steps that can reduce exposure substantially.
🎯 Key Takeaways
- ✓The video’s main priority list for organic vegetables starts with spinach and other leafy greens, because they often carry higher and multiple pesticide residues.
- ✓A key concern raised is “chemical stacking,” real life exposure involves mixtures over decades, while much testing focuses on single chemicals and short term effects.
- ✓Washing produce can help, but the video emphasizes that many pesticides are fat soluble or can penetrate into the plant, so rinsing is not a complete fix.
- ✓Use the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 as a practical shopping tool, especially when budget forces tradeoffs, and remember lists can vary by region and year.
- ✓Beyond shopping, the video’s lifestyle angle is that whole, unprocessed foods, sleep, exercise, stress reduction, and sometimes sauna can support the body’s natural detox capacity.
Why this “organic list” is really about your total toxic load
You are standing in the produce aisle, holding two bags of spinach. One says organic. One is cheaper. You are not trying to be “perfect,” you are trying to be practical.
The video frames this choice as bigger than a single purchase. The argument is that pesticide exposure is not just about what is on one leaf today, it is about the long, steady drip of chemicals across years, plus the way modern farming can weaken soil and plants, which can drive even more chemical use.
A single point lands hard: we are using more pesticides than ever. The speaker cites about 3.7 billion kilos per year, which he translates to a little over one pound per person. Even if that number feels abstract, the perspective is simple, these are poisons by design, and small amounts can matter for some people, especially with repeated exposure.
This is also where the video becomes less about “food fear” and more about systems. The framing is that aggressive farming pulls dozens of minerals out of soil, then replaces only a few with synthetic inputs. Over time, soil becomes depleted, microbial diversity drops, plants become weaker, pests become harder to manage, and chemical use rises. A vicious cycle.
Did you know? The USDA’s Pesticide Data Program (PDP) regularly tests foods for pesticide residues, and its reports are one of the main data sources used to build consumer friendly lists like the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15. You can explore the program here: USDA Pesticide Data Program.
The video’s Top 10 vegetables to buy organic (ranked)
This is the heart of the video: a prioritized list, not a vague “try to buy organic when you can.” It is meant to help you spend your money where it may matter most.
Below is the exact ranked set of vegetables the video calls out as the “dirtiest” in terms of pesticide residues and use.
1 to 5, the “do your best to always buy organic” group
A small but important nuance appears here. The list is ranked, and the speaker emphasizes that there is a big difference between number one and number ten. In his approach, the top half is where you get the biggest return on your organic dollars.
6 to 10, still high priority, but more flexible
Pro Tip: If you can only upgrade a few items to organic, start with the top five in the video’s list. That is the “highest impact” strategy this approach keeps returning to.
Why pesticides can be a bigger deal than “a little residue”
It is easy to hear “pesticide residue” and picture a tiny amount that surely cannot matter.
The video’s unique perspective is that the real problem is cumulative and combinational, not just a single chemical at a single dose.
The “chemical stacking” argument, explained simply
The speaker walks through a thought experiment using LD1 and LD50 (lethal dose concepts used in toxicology). The idea is that regulators often test chemicals one at a time, then define a dose that causes harm in a small percentage of test animals, and then apply a safety factor.
The critique is not that all testing is useless. It is that this method does not reflect real life.
In real life, you are not exposed to one chemical for one day. You might be exposed to many chemicals, in small amounts, across decades. The video argues that if one compound is enough to kill 1 percent of test animals acutely, the remaining 99 percent are not “fine,” they are stressed. Add a second compound, then a third, and the combined effect may not be additive (1 percent plus 1 percent). It could be far larger.
This concern overlaps with what many scientists call mixture effects or cumulative risk. Some agencies acknowledge this challenge. For example, the US Environmental Protection Agency discusses approaches to assessing pesticide risks, including cumulative considerations for chemicals with similar mechanisms. You can read more about EPA pesticide risk assessment here: EPA, Pesticide Risk Assessment.
Acute exposure vs chronic exposure
Another key distinction in the video is acute versus chronic exposure.
Short tests can detect immediate toxicity. But they cannot easily model what happens when small exposures accumulate over years. The video’s point is that long term, low dose exposure is hard to study perfectly, and controlling all variables for decades is close to impossible.
That is not a reason to panic. It is a reason to reduce avoidable exposure where it is easiest to do so.
Fat soluble chemicals and the “storage problem”
The speaker also emphasizes that many pesticides and pollutants are fat soluble, meaning they dissolve in fat rather than water. In this framing, fat soluble substances can accumulate in fatty tissues, including the brain and body fat, where turnover is slower.
The body does have detox systems, especially the liver, that can process many compounds. But the video’s argument is capacity based, if exposure exceeds what the body can process, more may be stored or “sequestered.”
Important: If you are pregnant, trying to conceive, or have a condition that affects liver function, it is worth discussing chemical exposures and dietary choices with a clinician you trust. This is not about extreme detox plans, it is about safer, steadier decisions.
Washing helps, but it is not the whole story
Rinsing your produce is still worth doing.
But the video is blunt about the limits. If a pesticide is fat soluble, it may not wash off easily with water alone. And if a substance has penetrated into the plant tissue, no amount of surface washing removes what is inside.
This is why the speaker treats “just wash it well” as incomplete advice, especially for the highest risk vegetables on the list.
That said, washing can reduce dirt, microbes, and some residues. The US Food and Drug Administration offers practical produce handling steps, including rinsing under running water and scrubbing firm produce. See: FDA, Tips for Fresh Produce Safety.
Here is a grounded way to combine both ideas, wash everything, and prioritize organic for the items most likely to carry residues.
Dirty Dozen, Clean 15, and the shopping shortcuts the video likes
The video leans heavily on a consumer strategy: use residue testing data to guide tradeoffs.
In the US, the USDA and FDA collect and publish pesticide residue testing data. Then an advocacy organization, the Environmental Working Group (EWG), analyzes that data and publishes the Dirty Dozen (highest residue) and Clean 15 (lowest residue) lists.
This approach is very practical. It is also dynamic. The speaker notes that lists can change by year and vary by region, but there is often overlap because certain crops are naturally more vulnerable.
»MORE: The video recommends checking EWG’s annual lists and supporting their work if you find it useful. You can find the latest lists here: EWG Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen.
The PLU code trick, and what it can and cannot do
The video also mentions PLU codes (price lookup codes) on produce stickers as a quick identifier:
This is a helpful shortcut, but it is not a perfect verification system. PLU codes are primarily for inventory and checkout, and not all produce has stickers.
Expert Q&A
Q: If I cannot afford organic, is conventional produce still worth eating?
A: Yes, for most people, eating more vegetables is still strongly associated with better health outcomes overall. The video’s approach is not “avoid produce,” it is “prioritize organic for the highest residue items,” then use tools like the Clean 15 to make budget friendly choices.
If cost is tight, focus on swapping the top five vegetables on the video’s list to organic first, keep washing everything, and aim for mostly whole foods. If you have special circumstances like pregnancy or immune suppression, consider getting personalized advice.
Health educator perspective, based on the video’s framework
A language point that shapes how you shop
The speaker has two “pet peeves” that are more than semantics.
First is the word conventional. The argument is that “conventional” sounds normal and safe, when it often means grown with chemical pesticides. Second is the grocery store labeling of a small corner as “natural foods,” which quietly implies the rest of the store is not natural.
This is the video’s storytelling punch: notice the labels, then decide what you want to vote for with your wallet.
The cleanest produce list (and why some plants resist pests)
After spending most of the time on the “dirtiest” vegetables, the video pivots to relief: some produce tends to carry fewer residues.
This is not presented as a reason to avoid organic. It is presented as a triage tool for real life.
Here are the “cleaner” items the video lists, in the order given:
The underlying logic is intuitive: some plants have built in defenses (like sulfur compounds), and others have physical barriers (thick skins or peels). This is also consistent with why peeling can reduce residues for some foods, though it may also remove fiber and nutrients.
What the research shows: Residue testing programs like the USDA Pesticide Data ProgramTrusted Source repeatedly find that residue levels vary widely by crop, which is why crop specific lists can be useful for targeted changes.
A practical plan to cut exposure by 80 to 90% without perfection
The video’s closing message is motivating: you cannot eliminate all exposures in a polluted world, but you can make smart choices and dramatically reduce what you take in.
This section turns the video’s ideas into simple steps.
How to shop using the video’s “two list” method
Always prioritize organic for the top five vegetables on the dirty list. Start with spinach, then the leafy greens group, then peppers, green beans, and tomatoes. This is the clearest “bang for your buck” rule in the video.
If you cannot buy organic, choose produce that tends to be cleaner. Use the Clean 15 concept as your backup plan, especially for items like avocado and onion.
Wash and handle produce like it matters, because it does. Rinse under running water, scrub firm produce, and keep cutting boards clean. The FDA’s produce safety guidanceTrusted Source is a good baseline.
Be extra cautious with waxed or high surface area produce. The video specifically flags cucumbers with wax, celery’s porous surface, and leafy greens with lots of folds.
Make your “vote with your wallet” consistent, not perfect. The speaker’s point is that repeated purchasing patterns influence what stores stock and what farmers grow.
A key nuance from the video: sometimes freshness wins. The speaker mentions occasionally choosing non organic broccoli if the organic option looks less fresh, because overall diet quality still matters.
The lifestyle piece, “detox” as daily capacity, not a cleanse
The video repeatedly returns to one idea: your body is always processing exposures, and lifestyle changes can support that capacity.
This is not presented as a magic shield against pesticides. It is presented as a way to avoid overwhelming your natural systems.
The speaker’s main lifestyle points:
Pro Tip: If “80 to 100% whole food” feels overwhelming, start with one daily anchor meal you can keep mostly unprocessed, for example a big salad with organic spinach, or a veggie scramble with organic peppers and tomatoes.
Expert Q&A
Q: Does buying organic guarantee pesticide free food?
A: No. Organic standards restrict many synthetic pesticides, but organic farms can still use certain approved pest controls, and trace residues can occur through drift or environmental contamination. The video’s point is not perfection, it is meaningful reduction, especially for crops that tend to show higher residues.
For the most accurate expectations, think of organic as “lower risk for certain pesticide exposures,” not “zero exposure.”
Nutrition focused health educator framing
Key Takeaways
Frequently Asked Questions
- Which vegetables did the video say you should always try to buy organic?
- The video emphasizes the top half of its list as highest priority: spinach, kale and related leafy greens (collards and mustard greens), bell and hot peppers, green beans, and tomatoes. If you can only switch a few items to organic, it suggests starting there.
- Is washing vegetables enough to remove pesticides?
- Washing can remove dirt and may reduce some surface residues, but the video stresses it is not a complete solution. Some pesticides are fat soluble or can move into plant tissue, and those are harder to remove with water alone.
- What are the Dirty Dozen and Clean 15 lists?
- They are annual consumer lists that summarize which fruits and vegetables tend to have the highest and lowest pesticide residues. They are commonly based on US residue testing data from agencies like the USDA and FDA, analyzed by groups such as EWG.
- What does a PLU code starting with 9 mean on produce?
- The video notes that a five digit PLU code starting with 9 usually indicates organic produce, while a four digit code is typically conventional. Not all produce has stickers, and PLU codes are not a perfect verification method.
- Are the video’s lists the same in every country?
- The video says the ranking was based on US data and that there can be regional variation and year to year changes. Still, it argues there is often overlap because some crops are naturally more vulnerable to pests and therefore more heavily treated.
Get Evidence-Based Health Tips
Join readers getting weekly insights on health, nutrition, and wellness. No spam, ever.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.




